Jr. Cook et al., The cost and cardioprotective effects of enalapril in hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction, AM J HYPERT, 11(12), 1998, pp. 1433-1441
This study examined the effect of enalapril on survival, resource use, and
cost of care in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and hypertension
using a retrospective analysis of patients who participated in the Studies
of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD). Among the 6797 SOLVD participants
, 1917 patients had either elevated systolic (greater than or equal to 140
mm Hg) or diastolic (greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg) blood pressure. The
rapy with enalapril was associated with a significant relative risk reducti
on for mortality (RR = 0.819, 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.98; P = .03). This resulted
in a gain of 0.11 years (95% CI: 0.00 to 0.20 years) of survival during th
e average 2.8 year follow-up for this subgroup and was projected to result
in a gain of 2.14 years (95% CI: 0.05 to 4.21 years) during the patient's l
ifetime. Enalapril significantly reduced the risk of first hospitalization
for heart failure by 37%, For all types of hospitalizations, there was an a
verage reduction of 32 hospitalizations per 100 patients treated with enala
pril during the trial period (95% CI: 11.8 to 52.2 hospitalizations avoided
per 100 patients), resulting in an estimated net savings of $1656 per pati
ent during the trial period (95% CI: increased cost of $191 to savings of $
3502). Although the projected lifetime net savings of $1456 was not signifi
cant (95% CI: increased cost of $9243 to saving of $12,527), evaluation of
the cost per life year saved indicated that enalapril represented a cost-ef
fective strategy. The estimated clinical benefit of enalapril among the hyp
ertensive subgroup in SOLVD supports the recommendation that angiotensin co
nverting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors should be considered as first line pharmac
ologic therapy for hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
From both the clinical and economic viewpoints, ACE inhibitors provide imp
ortant clinical benefits and are cost-effective. (C) 1998 American Journal
of Hypertension, Ltd.