Lc. Mcadam et al., Isobolographic analysis of the interactions between midazolam and propofolat GABA(A) receptors in embryonic mouse neurons, ANESTHESIOL, 89(6), 1998, pp. 1444-1454
Citations number
54
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Background: Clinical studies suggest that midazolam and propofol interact s
ynergistically to induce hypnosis, but these drugs do not interact synergis
tically to prevent movement in response to noxious stimuli. The mechanisms
underlying these interactions are not certain but may occur at the level of
the gamma-aminobutyric acid A (GABA(A)) receptor.
Methods: The authors evaluated the interactions between propofol and midazo
lam in modulating GABA(A) receptor activity in embryonic hippocampal neuron
s. The effects of midazolam and propofol on peak current evoked by submaxim
al concentrations of GABA were studied using the patch clamp method. Isobol
ographic analysis was undertaken by constructing concentration-response cur
ves for midazolam and propofol alone and then evaluating the potency of com
binations of midazolam and propofol. In other experiments, the concentratio
n of GABA was increased and flurazepam was substituted for midazolam.
Results: Isobolographic analysis confirmed that midazolam and propofol inte
ract synergistically to enhance currents evoked by low concentrations of GA
BA (1 mu M) Hen-ever, when the concentration of GABA was increased to 3 mu
M, the interaction was additive. The interaction between flurazepam and pro
pofol was also additive for enhancement of currents evoked by 3 mu M GABA.
Conclusions: The interaction between midazolam and propofol was critically
dependent on the concentration of GABA: Synergism was evident at low concen
trations of GABA, but an additive interaction was apparent when the concent
ration of GABA was increased. Changes in GABA(A) receptor function may unde
rlie the synergistic interaction between propofol and midazolam for clinica
l effects such as hypnosis. The clinical implication of the results is that
the benefits of synergism observed at one concentration ratio of these dru
gs map not be apparent at another.