Local cerebral blood flow, local cerebral glucose utilization, and flow - Metabolism coupling during sevoflurane versus isoflurane anesthesia in rats

Citation
C. Lenz et al., Local cerebral blood flow, local cerebral glucose utilization, and flow - Metabolism coupling during sevoflurane versus isoflurane anesthesia in rats, ANESTHESIOL, 89(6), 1998, pp. 1480-1488
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ANESTHESIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00033022 → ACNP
Volume
89
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1480 - 1488
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(199812)89:6<1480:LCBFLC>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Background Compared to isoflurane, knowledge of local cerebral glucose util ization (LCGU) and local cerebral blood flow (LCBF) during sevoflurane anes thesia is limited, Methods: LCGU, LCBF, and their overall means were measured in Sprague-Dan l ey rats (8 groups, n = 6 each) during sevoflurane and isoflurane anesthesia , 1 and 2 MAC, and in conscious control animals (2 groups, n = 6 each) usin g the autoradiographic 2-[C-14]deoxy-D-glucose and 4-iodo-N-methyl[C-14]ant ipyrinc methods. Results: During anesthesia mean cerebral glucose utilizati on was decreased:control 56 +/- 5 mu mol 100 g(-1) min(-1); 1 MAC isofluran e, 32 +/- 4 mu mol 100 g(-1) min(-1) (-43%); 1 MAC sevoflurane, 37 +/- 5 mu mol 100 g(-1) min(-1) (-34%); 2 MAC isoflurane, 23 +/- 3 mu mol. 100 g(-1) min(-1) (- 58%); 2 MAC sevoflurane, 23 +/- 5 mu mol 100 g(-1) min(-1) (-59% ). Local analysis showed a reduction In LCGU in the majority of the 40 brai n regions analyzed. Mean cerebral blood flow was increased as follows: cont rol 93 +/- 8 mi 100 g(-1) min(-1); 1 MAC isoflurane, 119 +/- 19 ml 100 g(-1 ) min(-1) (+28%); 1 MAC sevoflurane, 104 +/- 15 ml 100 g(-1) min(-1)(+12%); 2 MAC isoflurane, 149 +/- 17ml 100 g(-1) min(-1) (+60%); 2 MAC sevoflurane , 118 +/- 21 mi 100 g(-1) min(-1) (+27%). LCBF Tvas increased in most brain structures investigated. Correlation coefficients obtained for the relatio nship between LCGU and LCBF were as follows: control 0.93; 1 MAC isoflurane , 0.89; 2 MAC isoflurane, 0.71; 1 MAC sevoflurane, 0.83; 2 MAC sevoflurane, 0.59). Conclusion: Mean and local cerebral blood flows were lower during sevoflura ne than during Isoflurane anesthesia. This difference cannot be explained b y differing changes in glucose utilization because glucose utilization was decreased to the same extent in both groups.