H. Su et al., Effects of light leaf spot (Pyrenopeziza brassicae) on yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus), ANN AP BIOL, 132(3), 1998, pp. 371-386
The relationship between development of light leaf spot and yield loss in w
inter oilseed rape was analysed, initially using data from three experiment
s at sites near Aberdeen in Scotland in the seasons 1991/92, 1992/93 and 19
93/94, respectively. Over the three seasons, single-point models relating y
ield to Light leaf spot incidence (% plants with leaves with light leaf spo
t) at GS 3.3 (flower buds visible) generally accounted for more of the vari
ance than single-point models at earlier or later growth stages. Only in 19
92/93, when a severe light leaf spot epidemic developed on leaves early in
the season, did the single-point model for disease severity on leaves at GS
3.5/4.0 account for more of the variance than that for disease incidence a
t GS 3.3. In 1991/92 and 1992/3, when reasonably severe epidemics developed
on stems, the single-point model for light leaf spot incidence (stems) at
GS 6.3 accounted for as much of the variance. Two-point (disease severity a
t GS 3.3 and GS 4.0) and AUDPC models (disease incidence/severity) accounte
d for more of the variance than the single-point model based on disease inc
idence at GS 3.3 in 1992/93 but not in the other two seasons. Therefore, a
simple model using the light leaf spot incidence at GS 3.3 (x) as the expla
natory variable was selected as a predictive model to estimate % yield loss
(y(r)): y(r) = 0.32x - 0.57. This model fitted all three data sets from Sc
otland. When data sets from Rothamsted, Rosemaund and Thurloxton in England
were used to test it, this single-point predictive model generally fitted
the data well, except when yield loss was clearly not related to occurrence
of light leaf spot. However, the regression lines relating observed yield
loss to light leaf spot incidence at GS 3.3 often had smaller slopes than t
he line produced by the model based on Scottish data.