Agricultural economists postulate, that generic advertising should increase
the price. Otherwise the programm is nor rentabel. Marketing experts do no
t agree in this condition. They argue, that an increase in the share of the
market does also indicate the efficiency of a programm, even though the pr
ice decreases. This contradiction results from an incomplete set of assumpt
ions in the conventional normative economic models. Generic advertising doe
s not only increase the demand of the consumers. Special in German programs
the generic advertising activity is part of a complete marketing programm,
which also may reduce transaction costs in the marketing channel. A normat
ive analyze proofs, that price can decrease, market share increases and, un
der certain circumstances, the program is yet rentabel. An empirical exampl
e demonstrates, that the aggregation problem of econometric analyses may le
ad to an underestimate of the efficiency of genetic advertising programs. A
n alternative approach is proposed and tested.