Regional diversity and breadth of the National Cancer Data Base

Citation
Hr. Menck et al., Regional diversity and breadth of the National Cancer Data Base, CANCER, 83(12), 1998, pp. 2649-2658
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER
ISSN journal
0008543X → ACNP
Volume
83
Issue
12
Year of publication
1998
Pages
2649 - 2658
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-543X(199812)83:12<2649:RDABOT>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
BACKGROUND. The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), a joint project of the Co mmission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American Can cer Society, is a cancer management and outcomes data base for health care organizations. It provides a comparative summary of patient care that is us ed by participating hospitals and communities for self-assessment. This art icle describes the most current (1995) data. METHODS. Since 1989, 7 calls for data have been issued, yielding a total of 5,558,389 cancer patient reports for the years 1985-1995. A total of 1849 hospital cancer registries have participated in at least 1 of the calls for data. RESULTS. One thousand one hundred and fourteen hospitals from 50 states and the District of Columbia reported 655,627 cases for the diagnosis year 199 5. The hospitals represented a wide range of sizes (187 [16.8%] with 1000cases annually, 405 [36.4%] with 500-999 cases annually, 255 [22.9%] with 3 00-499 cases annually, 211 [18.9%] with 100-299 cases annually, and 56 [5%] with < 100 cases annually) and types (21 [1.9%] National Cancer Institute [NCI]-recognized cancer centers, 119 [10.7%] government hospitals, 102 [9.2 %] teaching hospitals, 256 [23.0%] large community hospitals, 297 [26.7%] m edium/small community hospitals, and 257 [23.1%] nongovernmental hospitals without approval status from the Commission on Cancer or NCI recognition). Remarkably similar distributions of cases by primary site and age were repo rted from each of six U.S. geographic regions. In addition, within each of these six regions, the cases were reported from a wide range of income stra ta and ethnicities. For several states, relatively few cancer cases were re ported. For several examples of relatively rare patient and tumor groups, a ll reported cases between 1985-1995 included potentially useful quantities of patients in whom further study of such special groups was warranted. CONCLUSIONS. The authors conclude that the reported cases most likely are r epresentative at the regional (but not state) level of cancer patients diag nosed and treated at U.S. hospitals with regard to types of cancer and ages of the patients. They conclude further that cancer reporting may be quite diverse within each region with regard to other known patient and reporting institution characteristics. Cancer 1998;83:2649-58. (C) 1998 American Can cer Society.