Screening for primary aldosteronism with a logistic multivariate discriminant analysis

Citation
Gp. Rossi et al., Screening for primary aldosteronism with a logistic multivariate discriminant analysis, CLIN ENDOCR, 49(6), 1998, pp. 713-723
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
ISSN journal
03000664 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
713 - 723
Database
ISI
SICI code
0300-0664(199812)49:6<713:SFPAWA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Primary aldosteronism (PA) is the most common endocrine cause of curable hypertension, but no single test unequivocally identifies it, Accor dingly, we investigated the usefulness of a logistic multivariate discrimin ant analysis (MDA) approach for PA screening, DESIGN Generation of a logistic MDA function based on retrospective analysi s of biochemical tests in a large cohort of referred patients with/without confirmed Conn's adenoma (CA), followed by prospective validation of the mo del, PATIENTS We investigated 574 selected hypertensives: 206 (32 with and 174 w ithout CA) retrospectively, 48 (with a 13% prevalence of CA) prospectively for the validation of the model, and 320 referred hypertensives (with a 3.4 % prevalence of CA) similarly evaluated, Patients were referred to a specia lised centre for hypertension (4th Clinica Medica-University of Padua) and to a department of Internal Medicine of a regional hospital (Reggio Emilia) , MEASUREMENTS In all patients we measured several demographic and biochemica l variables and performed a captopril test, A stepwise analysis of variance , based on a model fitted with several different variables, identified base line (sALDO) and captopril-suppressed plasma aldosterone (cALDO), supine pl asma renin activity (sPRA) and K+ as the most informative. Therefore, two m odels of logistic MDA with sPRA, K+, and either sALDO (model A) or cALDO (m odel B) were developed and used. ROC analysis was also performed to assess the optimal cut-off values. RESULTS The model B of MDA provided the best performance and identified CA with 100% sensitivity and 81% accuracy. When used prospectively it showed 1 00% sensitivity, both in the Padua (88% accuracy) and in the Reggio Emilia series (90% accuracy), However, at both institutions most patients with idi opathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) were also detected. CONCLUSIONS Thus, although developed from patients with confirmed Conn's ad enoma, a strategy based on multivariate discriminant analysis can be used p rospectively for accurate screening for primary aldosteronism. Furthermore, it was proven to be accurate and applicable to patients tested with simila r modalities at a different institution, Although this approach did not pro vide a clear-cut discrimination of Conn's adenoma from idiopathic hyperaldo steronism, it may avoid unnecessary and costly further testing in patients with a low probability of primary aldosteronism.