Does in vitro susceptibility to rifabutin and ethambutol predict the response to treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex bacteremia with rifabutin, ethambutol, and clarithromycin?

Citation
Sd. Shafran et al., Does in vitro susceptibility to rifabutin and ethambutol predict the response to treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex bacteremia with rifabutin, ethambutol, and clarithromycin?, CLIN INF D, 27(6), 1998, pp. 1401-1405
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
ISSN journal
10584838 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1401 - 1405
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-4838(199812)27:6<1401:DIVSTR>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The in vitro susceptibilities of baseline Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) blood isolates from 86 patients with AIDS who were treated with clarithrom ycin, ethambutol, and rifabutin were determined to examine whether these re sults predict bacteriologic response to treatment. No patient received prio r prophylaxis with clarithromycin or azithromycin. Minimum inhibitory conce ntrations (MICs) of clarithromycin for all isolates were less than or equal to 2 mu g/mL. The median MIC of rifabutin was between 0.25 and 0.5 mu g/mL , and all isolates were susceptible to less than or equal to 2 mu g of rifa butin/mL. The median MIC of ethambutol was 4 mu g/mL, and the MIC90 was 8 m u g/mL. There was no correlation between ethambutol susceptibility and subs equent bacteriologic clearance, At all time points through week 12, bacteri ologic clearance occurred more frequently in patients with isolates for whi ch MICs of rifabutin were lower, but this difference was statistically sign ificant only at week 2. Susceptibility testing for baseline MAC isolates fr om AIDS patients not previously treated with clarithromycin or azithromycin does not appear to be useful in guiding therapy.