Are the Duke criteria superior to the Beth Israel criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in children?

Citation
Ja. Stockheim et al., Are the Duke criteria superior to the Beth Israel criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in children?, CLIN INF D, 27(6), 1998, pp. 1451-1456
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
ISSN journal
10584838 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1451 - 1456
Database
ISI
SICI code
1058-4838(199812)27:6<1451:ATDCST>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
Accurate diagnosis of infective endocarditis may be diffcult. The Beth Isra el criteria and the newer Duke criteria assign probability to the diagnosis of infective endocarditis on the basis of the presence of common features and manifestations. We reviewed 111 cases of pediatric infective endocardit is diagnosed and treated over 19 years. Each case was classified by the two criteria, and the results were compared. Of 111 cases, 73 (66%) and 18 (16 %) were classified as definite by the Duke criteria and the Beth Israel cri teria, respectively, No cases were rejected by the Duke criteria, while 21 (19%) of 111 were rejected by the Beth Israel criteria. In 18 pathologicall y proven cases, reanalysis without pathological data showed that the Duke c riteria had significantly greater sensitivity (83%) than the Beth Israel cr iteria (67%) (P < .03). Echocardiographic evidence was required in 22 cases for definite classification by the Duke criteria; none were rejected, howe ver, when echocardiographic findings were ignored. Our results suggest that the Duke criteria are superior to the Beth Israel criteria for the diagnos is of pediatric infective endocarditis.