ANTIBODY-RESPONSES AGAINST EM18 AND EM16 SERODIAGNOSTIC MARKERS IN ALVEOLAR AND CYSTIC ECHINOCOCCOSIS PATIENTS FROM NORTHWEST CHINA
Citation
A. Ito et al., ANTIBODY-RESPONSES AGAINST EM18 AND EM16 SERODIAGNOSTIC MARKERS IN ALVEOLAR AND CYSTIC ECHINOCOCCOSIS PATIENTS FROM NORTHWEST CHINA, Japanese Journal of Medical Science & Biology, 50(1), 1997, pp. 19-26
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
SICI code
0021-5112(1997)50:1<19:AAEAES>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Western blot analysis was carried out in order to evaluate new serodia
gnostic markers, Em18 and Em16, for differentiation of alveolar echino
coccosis (AE) from cystic echinococcosis (CE) using 36 serum samples f
rom hydatid patients from Xinjiang, China, where AE and CE are both en
demic and one double infection case has been reported. All AE cases ex
cept one (5/6) who exhibited a calcified lesion and a single case of d
ouble infection showed antibody responses against Em18 and Em16. Some
of CE patient sera (6/22) showed antibody response against Em16 except
one who showed that against Em18. Analyses of IgG subclass responses
against Em18 and Em16 were carried out using all serum samples showing
antibody responses against Em18 and/or Em16 (seven CE, five AE, and o
ne AE + CE) and additional samples of three CE and 22 AE from Sichuan,
China. IgG(4) was the most predominant antibody subclass. Em18 and Em
16 were recognized by both IgG(4) and IgG(1) (in most cases) or by eit
her IgG(4) or IgG(1) (in minor cases) or by IgG(3) (in very rare cases
). Neither Em18 nor Em16 was recognized by IgG(2) antibodies. The usef
ulness of Em18 and Em16 as potential new markers for serological diffe
rentiation of human AE and CE, respectively, is discussed.