Chances and limitations for the use of the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in cattle.

Citation
D. Beier et al., Chances and limitations for the use of the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in cattle., DEUT TIER W, 105(11), 1998, pp. 408-412
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Veterinary Medicine/Animal Health
Journal title
DEUTSCHE TIERARZTLICHE WOCHENSCHRIFT
ISSN journal
03416593 → ACNP
Volume
105
Issue
11
Year of publication
1998
Pages
408 - 412
Database
ISI
SICI code
0341-6593(199811)105:11<408:CALFTU>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Enzootic bovine leukosis is caused by the bovine leukemia virus (BLV) and h as a world wide distribution in cattle. Due to the program for eradication of BLV-infections in Germany the BLV incidence in cattle declined and only few new cases seem to occur per year. On the other hand, BLV-infected cattl e with low, transient or without BLV-antibody titers are difficult to ident ify as BLV-infected. These animals may be sources for new infections. It wa s the aim of this study to compare the suitability of agargel-immunodiffusi on (AGID), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and polymerase chain r eaction (PCR) for diagnosis of BLV-infected cattle. We investigated a herd with 10 cows, where after a long period when the herd was negativ suddenly a positive serological reaction appeared. In addition 64 animals from 6 fed eral states of different herds with doubtful serological reactions found in previous tests were included. In the herd with 10 cows we were able to det ect BLV-infection in one animal 8 weeks earlier with PCR than with ELISA. I nvestigation of 56 adult cattle and 3 calves from different herds with both PCR and ELISA showed that 51 animals were positive in ELISA and 55 in PCR. Seven animal were positive in PCR and negative in ELISA. Three calves yiel ded negative results in PCR and positive results in ELISA. One cow which wa s positive in previous serological tests was negative in ELISA, AGID and PC R. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis demonstrated that the majority of the cattle was infected with the same BLV provirus variant. The four PCR variants used in this study yielded a similar sensitivity for BLV provirus detection. In conclusion, compared to the serological tests, PCR detects BLV-infection earlier in naturally infected cattle. The method is a lso a useful tool to exclude or confirm BLV-infection in cattle with doubtf ul serological results. PCR may be used to complement the serological tests in the diagnosis of BLV-infection.