Zm. Rasim et al., COMPARISON OF ADHESION FORMATION AND TENSILE-STRENGTH AFTER 3 LAPAROSCOPIC HERNIORRHAPHY TECHNIQUES, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy, 7(2), 1997, pp. 133-136
Several techniques for laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy have been d
escribed in the literature: laparoscopic extraperitoneal mesh repair (
EXTRA), transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair (TAPP), and intraperi
toneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM). To evaluate the incidence of adhesion
formation and the tensile properties of these techniques, young male
pigs underwent mesh placement using the above techniques. The animals
had follow-up for 6 weeks, and no trocar site adhesions were observed.
No intraperitoneal adhesions resulted in the group that underwent EXT
RA technique. One case of filmy omental adhesions was observed with th
e TAPP technique, and two cases of adhesions were associated with the
IPOM technique, one minimal and one case of dense adhesions to the bla
dder. The tensile strength of mesh incorporation into abdominal fascia
was compared for the three techniques and measured using a tensiomete
r. The IPOM technique resulted in the weakest tensile strength of 0.53
+/- 0.01 kg (mean +/- SEM), whereas both the EXTRA and TAPP were comp
arable and significantly stronger (p < 0.05), with tensiometric values
of 0.69 +/- 0.03 and 0.60 +/- 0.02 kg, respectively. We concluded tha
t IPOM, although technically the easiest procedure to perform, is asso
ciated with the highest risk of adhesion formation and the lowest tens
ile strength. In comparison, the EXTRA and the TAPP techniques had the
advantages of better tissue incorporation and tensile strength. Adhes
ion formation was not observed with the EXTRA technique, in which the
peritoneum was not violated, and was uncommon and minimal with the TAP
P technique.