Why do increased arrest rates appear to reduce crime: Deterrence, incapacitation, or measurement error?

Authors
Citation
Sd. Levitt, Why do increased arrest rates appear to reduce crime: Deterrence, incapacitation, or measurement error?, ECON INQ, 36(3), 1998, pp. 353-372
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Economics
Journal title
ECONOMIC INQUIRY
ISSN journal
00952583 → ACNP
Volume
36
Issue
3
Year of publication
1998
Pages
353 - 372
Database
ISI
SICI code
0095-2583(199807)36:3<353:WDIARA>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
This paper attempts to discriminate between deterrence, incapacitation, and measurement error as explanations for the negative empirical relationship between arrest rates and crime, Measurement error cannot explain the observ ed patterns in the data. Incapacitation suggests that an increase in the ar rest rate for one crime will reduces all crime rates; deterrence pl edicts that an increase in the arrest rate for one crime will lead to a rise in ot her crimes as criminals substitute away from the fil-st crime. Empirically deterrence appears to be the more important factor particularly for propert y crimes. (JEL K42).