Differential actions of the dopamine agonist bromocriptine on growth of SMtTW tumors exhibiting a prolactin and/or a somatotroph cell phenotype: Relation to dopamine D-2 receptor expression
J. Trouillas et al., Differential actions of the dopamine agonist bromocriptine on growth of SMtTW tumors exhibiting a prolactin and/or a somatotroph cell phenotype: Relation to dopamine D-2 receptor expression, ENDOCRINOL, 140(1), 1999, pp. 13-21
Dopamine (Da) and Da agonists are known to inhibit secretion and proliferat
ion of normal and tumoral PRL cells, through receptors of D-2 subtype. Beca
use of the lack of an experimental model, the relationship between bromocri
ptine (BR) sensitivity and D-2 receptor expression is poorly documented. Su
ch a relationship was analyzed using five lineages of spontaneous transplan
table rat pituitary tumors (SMtTW) exhibiting different PRL/GH phenotypes.
From plasma PRL and GH concentrations of rats bearing the tumors and tumor
messenger RNA contents, tumors were classified as PRL (SMtTW(2)), somatotro
ph (SMtTW(10)), or somatomammotroph (SMtTW(5)) tumors. Two lineages (SMtTW(
3) and SMtTW(4)) represented variants producing PRL and GH but with a high
predominance of PRL. With the exception of SMtTW(4) tumors, which were mali
gnant, all the tumors were benign and differed in their growth rate. Hormon
e production and growth of tumors with a PRL or a somatomammotroph phenotyp
e were reduced by about 90% under BR treatment, whereas somatotroph tumors
and the PRL malignant tumors were totally insensitive to BR. D-2 receptor m
essenger RNA was present in all BR-sensitive tumors and was not detected in
BR-resistant tumors.
In conclusion, using five lineages of SMtTW tumors that are representative
of the most frequent tumors encountered in human pituitary pathology, we fo
und a full concordance between tumor responses to BR and the expression of
D-2 receptor by the tumors. The identification of a tumor lineage with a ma
lignant phenotype, secreting high amounts of PRL and presenting a resistanc
e to BR, supports the idea that Da-resistant prolactinomas are aggressive t
umors.