Obejctive: Validation a self-administered form used by patients to record t
heir food intake and compare the recorded data with the observed intake.
Design: Data were obtained from an unselected cross-sectional group of hosp
italized patients.
Subejcts: Forty-five adult men and women volunteered to participate. Five o
f these dropped out.
Methods: Observed intake at breakfast, lunch and dinner was obtained by rec
ording the servings of food before they were served to the patients and sub
tracting weighed leftovers. At meal times the patients recorded food items
eaten in fractions of amount served to the nearest 25%.
Setting: Inpatients from five different wards at Rikshospitalet, Oslo.
Results: There was a significant under-reporting of the number of foods ser
ved (P < 0.005) resulting in a significant underestimation of energy 231 kJ
(P < 0.02). There was good agreement between the patients and the observer
s for the portions of most foods (Kappa 0.44-0.92, P < 0.00001). The differ
ences in amount had little influence on the difference in total energy. The
difference in number of foods correlated with the difference in energy (r
= 0.68, P < 0.001) and with the difference in protein (r = 0.50, P < 0.01).
Patients with an under estimation of energy above 20% had forgotten seven
or more food items.
Conclusions: For most patients, the self-administered form adapted to the h
ospital menu appears to have acceptable validity, but for some patients it
was unacceptable, mainly owing to food items being omitted and not because
of incorrect estimate of amounts of food.