A century ago, Antonio Berlese first discussed the close phylogenetic relat
ionship between the large mite groups Oribatida and Astigmata. Since then,
information having phylogenetic value has greatly increased and the paradig
ms within which we interpret it have changed. Herein I refine the general h
ypothesis that Astigmata originated within oribatid mites and suggest Malac
onothridae as a possible sister group. Among the 14 apomorphies used to sup
port the origin of Astigmata within oribatid mites are possession of latera
l opisthosomal glands, regression of hysterosomal setal pair f(1), paired p
relarval denticles, partially internalized chelicerae with incomplete adaxi
al walls, an atelobasic rutellum, pretarsal condylophores that articulate p
osteriorly with the tarsus, a dorsally fused palp tibia and tarsus and tran
sdehiscent ecdysis. A further 13 apomorphies support the origin of Astigmat
a at some level within Malaconothroidea. These include absence of an obliqu
e labiogenal articulation, presence of a distal rutellar lamella, shortenin
g of the palp tarsus, larval regression of hysterosomal seta f(2), loss of
the bothridial sera in all instars, and several losses and modifications of
leg setae. The hypothesis brings to light evolutionary questions that were
previously obscured by incorrect or inappropriate classifications. The nom
enclatural problems that arise from it are best solved by considering Astig
mata as a subgroup within Oribatida. Exp Appl Acarol 22: 559-594 1998 Kluwe
r Academic Publishers.