Target position variability throughout prostate radiotherapy

Citation
La. Dawson et al., Target position variability throughout prostate radiotherapy, INT J RAD O, 42(5), 1998, pp. 1155-1161
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS
ISSN journal
03603016 → ACNP
Volume
42
Issue
5
Year of publication
1998
Pages
1155 - 1161
Database
ISI
SICI code
0360-3016(199812)42:5<1155:TPVTPR>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the variability in prostate and seminal vesicle positi on during a course of external beam radiotherapy, and to measure the propor tion of target variability due to setup error. Methods and Materials: Forty-four weekly planning computerized tomography ( CT) studies were obtained on six patients undergoing radiotherapy for prost ate cancer, All patients were scanned in the radiotherapy treatment positio n, supine with an empty bladder, with no immobilization device. All organs were outlined on 3-mm-thick axial CT images. Anterior and lateral beam's ey e view digitally reconstructed radiographs and multiplanar reformatted imag es were generated, The position of the prostate and seminal vesicles relati ve to the isocenter location as set that day was recorded for each CT study . Target position relative to a bony landmark was measured to determine the relative contribution of setup error to the target position variability, Results: The seminal vesicle and prostate position variability was most sig nificant in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction, followed by cranial-caud al (CC) and mediolateral (ML) directions, Setup error contributed significa ntly to the total target position variability. Rectal filling was associate d with a trend to anterior movement of the prostate, whereas bladder fillin g was not associated with any trends, Although most deviations from the tar get position determined at the initial planning CT scan were within 10 mm, deviations as large as 15 mm and 19 mm were seen in the prostate and semina l vesicles respectively. Target position variations were evenly distributed around the initial target position for some patient studies, but unpredict able patterns were also seen. From a simulation based on the observed varia bility in target position, the AP, CC, and ML planning target volume (PTV) borders around the clinical target volume (CTV) required for target coverag e with 95% certainty are 12.4 mm, 10.3 mm, and 5.6 mm respectively for the prostate and 13.8 mm, 8.6 mm, and 3.9 mm respectively for the seminal vesic les, Conclusion: Target position variability is significant during prostate radi otherapy, requiring large PTV borders around the CTV. This target position variability may be potentially seduced by improving the setup accuracy, (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.