Safety instrumented functions and safety integrity levels (SIL)

Citation
P. Stavrianidis et K. Bhimavarapu, Safety instrumented functions and safety integrity levels (SIL), ISA TRANS, 37(4), 1998, pp. 337-351
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Instrumentation & Measurement
Journal title
ISA TRANSACTIONS
ISSN journal
00190578 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
337 - 351
Database
ISI
SICI code
0019-0578(1998)37:4<337:SIFASI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
This paper discusses two performance-based standards, ANSI/ISA S84.01 and I EC d61508, and the requirements they place upon user companies of electrica l, electronic and programmable electronic safety related systems (E/E/PE SR S) or Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS). To comply to the requirements of t he standards, a user company would have to: (a) identify the safety target level of the process; (b) evaluate the hazardous events that pose a risk hi gher than the safety target level; (c) determine the safety function(s) tha t must be implemented in an SIS to achieve the safety target level; (d) imp lement the safety functions in an SIS and evaluate its safety integrity lev el (SIL); (e) install, test and commission the SIS; and (f) verify that the installed SIS does in fact reduce the process risk to below the safety tar get level. Several risk analysis techniques that can be used to comply with the aforementioned requirements are discussed and a simple example is used to illustrate the use, advantages and disadvantages of the techniques. The evaluation of SIL of the SIS (probability to fail to respond to a process demand) is outside the scope of this paper. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd.. All rights reserved.