I examined four hypotheses about causes for the dramatically high coas
tal wetland losses (0.86% yr(-1)) in the northern Gulf of Mexico: an e
xtensive dredged canal and spoil bank network, a decline in sediments
in the Mississippi River during the 1950s, Mississippi River navigatio
n and flood protection levees, and salinity changes. Natural factors c
ontributing to these habitat changes include eustatic sea-level rise a
nd geological compaction, which appear to have remained relatively con
stant this century, although variation does occur. These four hypothes
es were tested using data on land-to-water changes in 15-min quadrangl
e maps inventoried for four intervals between the 1930s and 1990. Land
loss rates were directly proportional to changes in wetland hydrology
in time and space. A linear regression of the direct losses due to dr
edging versus the losses due to all other factors (indirect losses) ha
d a zero intercept and a slope that increased with time. The ratio ind
irect:direct land loss was highest nearest the estuarine entrance. The
coastwide patterns of land loss do not appear to be affected by river
ine sediment reductions over the last 60 yr. The effects of changes in
wetland hydrology from dredging human-made channels and forming dredg
ed spoil banks appear to be the most efficacious hypothesis explaining
these dramatic losses. The effects of extensive human-induced changes
on this coast have apparently overwhelmed the causal linkages identif
ied in the historical re-constructionist view of deltaic gain and loss
that emphasizes the role of mineral sediments. A paradigm shift is th
erefore proposed that emphasizes a broad ecological view as contrasted
to a mostly physical view emphasizing the role of sediment supply in
wetland maintenance. In this view, plants are not an ancillary consequ
ence of strictly geological dynamics such as sediment supply but are d
ominant agents controlling factors relevant to coastal restoration and
management efforts.