J. Huober et al., Tandem and triple high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue in metastatic breast cancer, J CANC RES, 124(12), 1998, pp. 690-694
The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy
and toxicity of a tandem or triple high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autol
ogous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) in patients with m
etastatic breast cancer (MBC) as first line chemotherapy. Conventional chem
otherapy consisted of two cycles of epirubicin 120 mg/m(2) and ifosfamide 7
500 mg/m(2) in the case of tandem HDC and one cycle of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(
2), epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and ifosfamide 6000 mg/m(2) in the case of triple
HDC. Tandem HDC was composed of two cycles of epirubicin 180 mg/m(2), ifos
famide 12000 mg/m(2) and carboplatin 900 mg/m(2). In the case of triple HDC
, paclitaxel 180 mg/m(2), etoposide 1500 mg/m(2) and thiotepa 600 mg/m(2) w
as added as the third cycle. Patients with tandem HDC (n = 20) were evaluab
le for both survival and toxicity, and patients with triple HDC (n = 21) on
ly for toxicity because of short-term follow-up. Both tandem and triple HDC
were well tolerated and could be safely administered. Non-hematological WH
O grade 3 or 4 toxicities were mucositis (8), temporary renal insufficiency
(1), myocardial infarction (1), and neuropathy (1). No toxic death occurre
d. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for 44-months without progression and the ove
rall survival were 12% and 38% respectively. The median survival was 22 mon
ths (95% CI: 7.4-51.7 months) and the median progression-free interval 14 m
onths (95% CI: 5.1-43.7 months). In a population with an unfavorable progno
sis, tandem HDC showed similar efficacy as to that described in other phase
II studies. Triple HDC seems not to improve patient outcome compared to ta
ndem HDC, but a long-term follow up is required.