E. Cienciala et al., Analysis of carbon and water fluxes from the NOPEX boreal forest: Comparison of measurements with FOREST-BGC simulations, J HYDROL, 213(1-4), 1998, pp. 62-78
The ecosystem process model, FOREST-BGC, was applied on a stand in the NOPE
X region in central Sweden. It was compared with measured data of net ecosy
stem carbon flux (F-n) and transpiration (E-Q) on a daily basis. Using the
parameterized model, yearly budgets of carbon and water were constructed. F
-n was obtained from eddy correlation measurements on a tower at heights of
35 and 100 m. E-Q was obtained from sap how measurements using a heat bala
nce method. The model predictions were generally good, considering the rela
tively low requirements for input parameters. The explained variability of
E-Q was high (95%), particularly relative to the presence of large water de
ficit conditions on the site. The explained variability of F-n, was lower:
it was 50% and 66% when compared to the measurements at 35 and 100 m, respe
ctively. These results reflect the large spatial variability of F-n and the
quantitative differences of measured F-n at the two heights over a patchy
forest consisting of small stands of different age, density and pine/spruce
composition (the validation was made prior to a detailed footprint analysi
s). The model performed differently for various periods during a year, whic
h demonstrates the value of long-term measurements for model validations. T
he simulated yearly net carbon ecosystem uptake for the 50-year-old stand w
ith a high leaf area index was 1.99 t ha(-1), with a range of 0.55-2.04 t h
a(-1) for leaf area index of 3-6 observed at the NOPEX site. The model anal
ysis of controls for mass fluxes showed that soil water shortage was the ma
in limiting factor on the NOPEX site in the year studied. The comparative m
odel run for the northern BOREAS site in central Canada indicated that a hi
gh atmospheric drought and plant resistance to water how frequently limited
fluxes there. A more maritime climate of NOPEX site permits a larger gross
production; however, larger respiration and decomposition rates reduce the
quantitative differences of net ecosystem carbon uptake relative to the BO
REAS site with a continental climate. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All ri
ghts reserved.