Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of an upper cervical manipulation
and a manipulation of the sacroiliac joint for increasing hip range of moti
on.
Design: Clinical cohort study.
Setting: Macquarie University Centre for Chiropractic Outpatient Clinic.
Sample: Fifty-two randomly chosen university students aged 18 to 34 yr.
Method: A reliable hand-held dynamometer was used to determine the end poin
t of range of motion before and after the application of a treatment. Three
groups of subjects were created: cervical manipulation, sacroiliac manipul
ation and sham/placebo. Range of motion of the hip in flexion (SLR) was use
d as the independent variable.
Results: The two manipulative treatments resulted in increased flexion rang
e of motion at the hip. Statistical analysis revealed that only the upper c
ervical manipulation procedure increased hip flexion range of motion signif
icantly.
Conclusion: The results suggest that manual therapy of the neck may affect
hip range of motion in normal adults. Findings such as these may indicate t
he existence of a link between the cervical spine and the lower extremity.