Applicability of the new ITKA GSD Basic 250 electrosurgical unit to urologic endoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery and urologic open surgery

Citation
O. Lukkarinen et P. Tuuttila, Applicability of the new ITKA GSD Basic 250 electrosurgical unit to urologic endoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery and urologic open surgery, J MED EN TE, 22(6), 1998, pp. 270-273
Citations number
6
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
ISSN journal
03091902 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
270 - 273
Database
ISI
SICI code
0309-1902(199811/12)22:6<270:AOTNIG>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to assess the applicability of a new ITKA GSD Basic 250 electrosurgical unit (ESU) to urologic endoscopic surgery, laparo scopic surgery and open urologic surgery, ifs possible interference with vi deorecording and stray currents in healthy tissues. A new ITKA GSD Basic 25 0 ESU (test ESU) was used and compared to conventional ESU (Berchtold Elekt rotom 390 as reference ESU). Experimental surgery was carried out on three female pigs, which underwent endoscopic, laparoscopic and open surgery. Alt ogether 29 patients underwent either endoscopic or open surgery with the te st ESU. In experimental surgery, the ideal cutting and coagulation settings of the test ESU were in the range 15-25 % for endoscopic surgery. In lapar oscopic surgery, tissues were ideally resected and removed at 10-15 % power settings. In open experimental surgery, the ideal power settings were 29-3 0 %. In human surgery, the test ESU operated well at 25-35 % power settings in endoscopic surgery, while in open surgery on humans the ideal settings were 25-35 % in monopolar we and 20-25 % in bipolar use. When used for endo scopic operations, the test ESU did not interfere with videorecording. Nor were any adverse effects seen in the surrounding tissues. The patients had neither early nor late complications. Histopathological findings revealed n o differences in healing between the test ESU and reference ESU. Experiment al and patient surgery showed the test ESU to be both safe and effective. I t is suitable to be used in urologic endoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surge ry and open urologic surgery. It does not interfere with videorecording or cause harmful stray currents in surrounding tissues. Power can be adjusted linearly and precisely. Low-power operation is also possible.