Chemoprotective properties of phenylpropenoids, bis(benzylidene)cycloalkanones, and related Michael reaction acceptors: Correlation of potencies as phase 2 enzyme inducers and radical scavengers
At. Dinkova-kostova et al., Chemoprotective properties of phenylpropenoids, bis(benzylidene)cycloalkanones, and related Michael reaction acceptors: Correlation of potencies as phase 2 enzyme inducers and radical scavengers, J MED CHEM, 41(26), 1998, pp. 5287-5296
Induction of phase 2 enzymes (e.g., glutathione transferases, NAD(P)H:quino
ne reductase, glucuronosyltransferases, epoxide hydrolase) is a major strat
egy for reducing the susceptibility of animal cells to neoplasia and other
forms of electrophile toxicity. In a search for new chemoprotective enzyme
inducers, a structure-activity analysis was carried out on two types of nat
urally occurring and synthetic substituted phenylpropenoids: (a) Ar-CH=CH-C
O-R, where R is OH, OCH3, CH3, or Ar, including cinnamic, coumaric, ferulic
, and sinapic acid derivatives, their ketone analogues, and chalcones; and
(b) bis(benzylidene)cycloalkanones, Ar-CH=C(CH2)(n)(CO)C=CH-Ar, where n = 5
, 6, or 7. The potencies of these compounds in inducing NAD(P)H:quinone red
uctase activity in murine hepatoma cells paralleled their Michael reaction
acceptor activity (Talalay, P.; De Long, M. J,; Prochaska, H. J. Proc. Natl
. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 1988, 8261-8265). Unexpectedly, the bis(benzylidene
)cycloalkanones also powerfully quenched the lucigenin-derived chemilumines
cence evoked by superoxide radicals. Introduction of o-hydroxyl groups on t
he aromatic rings of these phenylpropenoids dramatically enhanced their pot
encies not only as inducers for quinone reductase but also as quenchers of
superoxide. These potentiating o-hydroxyl groups are hydrogen-bonded, as sh
own by moderate downfield shift of their proton NMR resonances and their se
nsitivities to the solvent environment. The finding that the potencies of a
series of bis(benzylidene)cycloalkanones in inducing quinone reductase app
ear to be correlated with their ability to quench superoxide radicals sugge
sts that the regulation of phase 2 enzymes may involve both Michael reactio
n reactivity and radical quenching mechanisms.