The objectives of this paper are to review the rational, the present result
s and future of laparoscopic-assisted bowel surgery in patients with inflam
matory bowel disease (IBD).
Only a few centres in the world report on laparoscopic bowel resection in I
BD that include stoma surgery, ileocolic resection, left, right and (sub)to
tal colectomy for Crohn's disease, and subtotal or restorative total procto
colectomy (ileal pouch anal procedures).
The combined series report conversion rates between 2.5% and 22.2%. Ileocol
ic resection, stoma creation, stricturoplasty and segmental small bowel res
ection are associated with an acceptable length of surgery, but laparoscopi
c(-assisted) total colectomy or restorative proctocolectomy still demand up
to 4-6 hours of operative time. The few randomised studies addressing lapa
roscopic-assisted (segmental) bowel surgery versus conventional surgery dem
onstrated significantly less pain, a quicker return to self-care and a shor
ter hospital stay. The results of the series reporting on laparoscopic-assi
sted (ileo)colectomy in IBD are similar to those from these randomised stud
ies. Laparoscopic-assisted subtotal colectomy and restorative proctocolecto
my have no benefit compared with conventional surgery other than superior c
osmesis. Morbidity of laparoscopic (ileo)colectomy in IBD is low, that of l
aparoscopic-assisted subtotal colectomy and restorative proctocolectomy rem
ains to be seen.
The various laparoscopic bowel resections done in IBD are all feasible. The
first series describing laparoscopic surgery for IBD indicate that laparos
copic-assisted segmental (ileo)colectomy is safe and is the preferred appro
ach provided it is done in a centre specialised in the treatment of IBD and
by skilled laparoscopic surgeons beyond the learning curve. Until now, lap
aroscopic-assisted subtotal colectomy and restorative proctocolectomy do no
t have the same short-term benefits as seen in other laparoscopic colorecta
l procedures. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a high li
fe-time risk of having abdominal surgery and reoperations. The proposed adv
antages of laparoscopic surgery in this group of young patients might be hi
gher than in patients with other colorectal diseases. Minimal physiologic i
nsult in patients who already are under significant physiologic stress, les
s adhesion formation and superior cosmesis re important benefits over time.
In a time where patient's demands will increase, the future of laparoscopi
c colonic surgery in IBD looks assured. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All
rights reserved.