Ar. Jutsum et al., Pesticide resistance: Assessment of risk and the development and implementation of effective management strategies, PEST SCI, 54(4), 1998, pp. 435-446
Insecticides, fungicides and herbicides are critical to successful crop pro
duction, but the development of pesticide resistance is a continual threat,
especially to many of today's selective toxophores with specific binding s
ites. In order to manage resistance effectively, an assessment of genetic,
ecological and operational risk factors is required, which must then be tra
nslated into meaningful local strategies that can be implemented through ap
propriate labelling of products and education of end users. Assessing resis
tance risk is a fundamental part of the development process for new molecul
es and is increasingly becoming a requirement of registration alongside tox
icological and environmental risk data. Laboratory studies, including eluci
dation of target sites and metabolic degradation pathways, mutagenesis, com
puter models and cross-resistance tests, and field studies, including estab
lishment of baseline sensitivities and evaluation of anti-resistance strate
gies, all play a part in such assessment. The challenge is then to devise m
anagement strategies which are relevant to local practice and actually redu
ce selection pressure to a point where product life is preserved. A prevent
ative strategy should be in place at time of launch and for most pesticides
, regional co-operation between all interested parties, of the kind advocat
ed by the Resistance Action Committees of GCPF (Global Crop Protection Fede
ration), increases the chance of success. Implementation of strategies via
a universal product labelling system, already practised in some herbicide m
arkets, is seen as a key way to improve product usage patterns. Monitoring
resistance levels in field populations after product launch enables any fin
e tuning of tactics over time, for example in response to new technologies
such as transgenic varieties being introduced. The limited successes in res
istance management in Australia, Zimbabwe, Europe and USA are not so easily
achieved in small-holder farming in developing countries, as exemplified b
y continuing problems in parts of India and China. Emphasis must be given t
o the education of growers and dealers in IRM and IPM, and improved extensi
on services, in order to bring about a more sustainable approach to crop pr
otection. (C) 1998 Society of Chemical Industry.