Three system models (closed, open, and dissipative systems) are presented a
nd compared with traditional models for the adoption of new technology, and
for the operation of information provision centers (e.g., libraries). It i
s argued that information provision centers have existed for the last centu
ry as closed systems, but are now forced into an open systems paradigm by t
echnological and economic environmental factors. A closed, or autopoietic,
system is defined as any system whose contact with its environment produces
no profound effect on the system. Libraries, in particular, have behaved a
s closed systems by maintaining internal structures (e.g., dissemination st
ructures, service structures, classification and record structures, etc.),
and engineering-based scientific Principles to perform four basic functions
: to (i) select; (ii) organize; (iii) disseminate; and (iv) preserve inform
ation containers (as opposed to information itself). An open system, on the
other hand, is one in which the system's environment plays a profound role
in the system's development and evolution. It is argued that the relations
hip between a library and its environment is increasingly interdependent du
e to an increasingly integrated telecommunications infrastructure, and that
traditional library functions break down in an open systems paradigm. A di
ssipative system is one in which organizations lose identity in order to ad
apt rapidly to radical environmental change. Such systems are in constant s
earch for means to sustain internal and environmental relationships. Implic
ations for LIS education, management of information centers, and the econom
ics of information provision are discussed.