There are 2 families of statistical procedures in meta-analysis: fixed- and
random-effects procedures. They were developed for somewhat different infe
rence goals: making inferences about the effect parameters in the studies t
hat have been observed versus making inferences about the distribution of e
ffect parameters in a population of studies from a random sample of studies
. The authors evaluate the performance of confidence intervals and hypothes
is tests when each type of statistical procedure is used for each type of i
nference and confirm that each procedure is best for making the kind of inf
erence for which it was designed. Conditionally random-effects procedures (
a hybrid type) are shown to have properties in between those of fixed- and
random-effects procedures.