Mammography grid performance

Citation
Ps. Rezentes et al., Mammography grid performance, RADIOLOGY, 210(1), 1999, pp. 227-232
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
RADIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00338419 → ACNP
Volume
210
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
227 - 232
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-8419(199901)210:1<227:MGP>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
PURPOSE: To measure directly the grid performance of mammography units for the range of breast thicknesses and x-ray tube potentials encountered in cl inical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Contrast improvement factors and Bucky factors were determined for four mammographic units as a function of x-ray tube potentia l (25, 30, and 35 kVp), phantom thickness (2, 4, and 8 cm) and, on one unit , three target-filter combinations. Three units used a linear grid; one, a cellular grid. Two methods were used for nongrid measurements. RESULTS: For all units tested, contrast improvement factor increased with i ncreased phantom thickness and with increased kilovolt peak level for the 8 -cm-thick phantom and changed little with kilovolt peak level for 2- and 4- cm-thick phantoms. At 25 and 30 kVp, contrast improvement factor performanc e with the linear grids was comparable; with the cellular grid, it was 5%-1 0% higher. In all cases, the Bucky factor increased with increased phantom thickness and decreased with increased tube potential. CONCLUSION: Differences in grid performance exist. At 25 and 30 kVp, the ce llular grid exhibited superior contrast improvement factor performance, whe reas one of the linear grids exhibited superior Bucky factor performance. M easured contrast improvement and Bucky factors are dependent on nongrid tec hnique. Cassette tunnels introduce scatter and should not be used with nong rid or-magnification techniques.