This explorative paper investigates how firms in the global data-processing
industry that seek patent protection for their innovations in Europe have
coped with the patentability requirements of the European Patent Office. St
arting from a continuous research spectrum with basic research on the one e
xtreme and development on the other, the main hypothesis is as follows: fir
ms that carry out more basic research are more successful in passing the pa
tent office than firms that focus more on development. Basic research explo
res more novel and unknown technical paths, while development aims more at
modifying and redesigning existing products. Therefore, the results from mo
re basic-oriented research are expected to fulfill the patentability requir
ements relatively more often than the results from development. This hypoth
esis is tested and largely confirmed for the global data-processing industr
y (with a sample of 44 firms) in the period 1986-1990, using indirect varia
bles for basic research and development. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V, All
rights reserved.