In a preceding paper, I studied the significance of Jarrett's and Shimony's
analyses of 'factorisability' into 'parameter independence' and 'outcome i
ndependence' for clarifying the nature of non-locality in quantum phenomena
. I focused on four types of non-locality; superluminal signalling, action-
at-a-distance, non-separability and holism. In this paper, I consider a fif
th type of non-locality: superluminal causation according to 'logically wea
k' concepts of causation, where causal dependence requires neither action n
or signalling. I conclude by considering the compatibility of non-factorisa
ble theories with relativity theory. In this connection, I pay special atte
ntion to the difficulties that superluminal causation raises in relativisti
c spacetime. My main findings in this paper are: first, parameter-dependent
and outcome-dependent theories both involve superluminal causal connection
s between outcomes and between settings and outcomes. Second, while relativ
istic deterministic parameter-dependent theories seem impossible on pain of
causal paradoxes, relativistic indeterministic parameter-dependent theorie
s are not subjected to the same challenge. Third, current relativistic non-
factorisable theories seem to have some rather unattractive characteristics
. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.