In recent times, a wave of public sector reforms has swept through develope
d, developing and transitional countries, prompting observers to herald the
emergence of a 'new public management revolution'. However, this tendency,
while evident across a range of nations, both North and South, is a comple
x, highly uneven and contradictory process. Indeed, we concur with, and see
k to develop, the point by Polidano, who notes that it can 'be argued that
such a thing as a unified coherent new public management model exists only
in concept'. Subsequently, the paper is divided into two main parts. The fi
rst provides a brief overview of the broader purported changes in local gov
ernance by outlining aspects of Clarke and Newman's thesis concerning the m
anagerialisation of local government. Thereafter, we consider some of the k
ey determinants of, and contradictions within, transitions to the new manag
erialism in two contrasting contexts, the UK and India. In doing so, we see
k to highlight the importance of transitions in governance structures not a
s some end state but as a complex of interrelated processes which interconn
ect, as Dicken et al. suggest, 'in a complex and contingent fashion with ex
tant (historically and geographically specific)' socio-institutional, econo
mic, and political structures.