Periprosthetic femoral fractures: Treatment and results in 51 cases

Citation
A. Siegmeth et al., Periprosthetic femoral fractures: Treatment and results in 51 cases, UNFALLCHIRU, 101(12), 1998, pp. 901-906
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
UNFALLCHIRURG
ISSN journal
01775537 → ACNP
Volume
101
Issue
12
Year of publication
1998
Pages
901 - 906
Database
ISI
SICI code
0177-5537(199812)101:12<901:PFFTAR>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Periprosthetic femoral fractures present the problem of fracture treatment and prosthetic stability. Various treatment options are recommended for man aging these fractures. We treated 51 patients with 54 periprosthetic fractu res between 1985 and 1995. Of these, 42 (78 %) fractures were treated with a plate, eight (14 %), with a revision prosthesis, two (4 %), with retrogra de nailing, and two (4 %), conservatively due to poor medical condition. Th e choice of fracture management was dependent on the type and location of t he fracture and on the stability of the prosthesis. A total of 50 fractures healed primarily. Complications included th ree cases of plate loosening, one further fracture, one deep infection, one broken bolt and one varus def ormity. Four patients died in the postoperative period, an additional 19 we re dead at the time of the evaluation. Fractures with a stable implant can be treated with plate fixation. Cases of a loose implant require revision. Distal fractures are stabilized with a plate or with a retrograde nail.