OBJECTIVE: This study's objectives were to describe symptoms related to bow
el dysfunction in women with uterovaginal prolapse and to compare these sym
ptoms according to extent of posterior vaginal prolapse.
STUDY DESIGN: One hundred forty-three women completed a questionnaire asses
sment of bowel function and underwent standardized physical examination acc
ording to the International Continence Society's system for grading uterova
ginal prolapse.
RESULTS: The mean age was 59.2 years (SD 11.8 years); 78% of the women were
postmenopausal. According to the furthest extent of posterior vaginal prol
apse at point Bp, 22 (15.5%) were in stage 0, 46 (32.4%) were in stage 1, 5
0 (35.2%) were in stage 11, 23 (16.2%) were in stage III, and 1 (0.7%) was
in stage IV. Ninety-two percent of women reported having bowel movements at
least every other day. When asked whether straining was required for them
to have a bowel movement, 38 (26.6%) reported never or rarely, 71 (49.6%) r
eported sometimes, 20 (14.0%) reported usually, and 14(9.8%) reported alway
s. When asked whether they ever needed to help stool come out by pushing wi
th a finger in the vagina or rectum, 98 (69.0%) reported never or rarely, 3
0 (21.1%) reported sometimes, 8 (5.6%) reported usually and 6 (4.2%) report
ed always. Twenty-three women (16.1%) had fecal incontinence, with 11 havin
g loss of control of stool less often than once a month and 12 having it mo
re often than once a month. When asked whether to rate how much they were b
othered by their bowel function on a scale of 1 to 10, with I being not at
all and 10 being extremely, 51.7% of women chose 1 to 4, 20.3% chose 5 to 7
, and 28% chose greater than or equal to 8. There were no clinically signif
icant associations between any of the questions related to bowel function a
nd severity of posterior vaginal prolapse.
CONCLUSION: Women with uterovaginal prolapse frequently have symptoms relat
ed to bowel dysfunction, but this is not associated with the severity of po
sterior vaginal prolapse.