Power Doppler sonography assessment of tumor recurrence after chemoembolization therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Citation
S. Sumi et al., Power Doppler sonography assessment of tumor recurrence after chemoembolization therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma, AM J ROENTG, 172(1), 1999, pp. 67-71
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY
ISSN journal
0361803X → ACNP
Volume
172
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
67 - 71
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-803X(199901)172:1<67:PDSAOT>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
OBJECTIVE, This study was undertaken to determine the value of power Dopple r sonography in the evaluation of recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Forty-five patients (age range, 45-81 years; mean age , 61 years) with hepatocellular carcinomas prospectively underwent power Do ppler sonography, helical CT, and intraarterial digital subtraction angiogr aphy before and after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy to e valuate for tumor recurrence. Three to 6 months after transcatheter arteria l chemoembolization therapy, the Doppler signal; its location, and shape we re evaluated. The results were compared with tumor vascularity as determine d on helical CT and intraarterial digital subtraction angiography, which we re used as the gold standards (n = 142). RESULTS. A sonographic signal was seen in 80 of 142 lesions with power Dopp ler sonography. Flow signal in lesions tended to be more difficult to detec t in the left lobe (sensitivity, 74%) than in the right lobe (sensitivity, 93%). The location of the color signal was in the tumor's center, on its pe riphery, or both. No correlation between tumor recurrence and the location of a signal within a tumor was found. Power Doppler sonography had a sensit ivity of 87%, a specificity of 85%, and an accuracy of 86% in revealing tum or recurrence after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy. All l esions that showed linear signals in the center or at the periphery of the tumors proved to be recurring tumors (n = 20). In lesions with spotty signa ls, tumor recurrence was not revealed in nine of 60 lesions. CONCLUSION. Power Doppler sonography can be used for follow-up studies afte r transcatheter arterial chemoembolization therapy as a sensitive and cost- effective imaging technique. Although spotty signals were frequently seen, linear signals appeared to be specific for tumor recurrence.