A potentiometric and differential pulse polarographic study of Cd-II with 1-hydroxyethylenediphosphonic acid

Citation
I. Cukrowski et al., A potentiometric and differential pulse polarographic study of Cd-II with 1-hydroxyethylenediphosphonic acid, ANALYT CHIM, 379(1-2), 1999, pp. 217-226
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Spectroscopy /Instrumentation/Analytical Sciences
Journal title
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
ISSN journal
00032670 → ACNP
Volume
379
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
217 - 226
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-2670(19990111)379:1-2<217:APADPP>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
The complexation of the ligand 1-hydroxyethylenediphosphonic acid (HEDP) wi th Cd-II was studied by differential pulse polarography (DPP) and glass ele ctrode potentiometry (GEP) at fixed total Ligand to total metal concentrati on ratios and varied pH values. Labile and non-labile metal complexes were analysed simultaneously by the use of a polarographic experimental complex formation curve (ECFC) and the calculated complex formation curve (CCFC). C omplex formation curves were used for modelling of the metal-ligand system and the refinement of stability constants. The ECFC, in which experimental parameters of only labile DPP peak are included (a shift in the peak potent ial and a variation in the peak height) appears to be a characteristic func tion for a full metal-ligand model (labile and non-labile parts of a metal- ligand system). The CCFC is a theoretical curve calculated for the assumed metal-ligand model from mass-balance equations. The final model of metal sp ecies formed is the one, which is confirmed by these two experimental techn iques, and for which stability constants of metal complexes obtained from D PP and GEP differ the least. Six cadmium complexes M(H4L), M(H2L), M2L, ML (all labile), ML2 (non-labile), and ML(OH) (labile) and their stability con stants as log beta found from DPP 25.04 +/- 0.06, 19.56 +/- 0.02, 12.67 +/- 0.03, 7.26 +/- 0.02, 10.39 +/- 0.06 and 10.93 +/- 0.04, respectively, are reported. Results obtained from GEP are also reported and they differ from polarographic results only within the experimental errors typical for these techniques. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.