Ultraviolet spectra using Hubble Space Telescope sampled between 1250 and 1
680 Angstrom, at spectral resolution less than or equal to 0.57 Angstrom ar
e reported for characteristically bright regions of Jupiter's morning and a
fternoon northern aurora. Several observed spectra exhibit sharply enhanced
resolution. We interpret this as bright auroral emission foreshortened on
the morning limb with a maximum intensity at least as high as 2000 kR. We h
ave searched for evidence that the primary precipitating particles exciting
the aurora include the heavy ions known to exist in Jupiter's plasma torus
and magnetosphere. We have also searched for such ambient heavy ions and n
eutrals at rest in the amoral ionosphere, the end products of previous prec
ipitation, excited by the auroral cascade. We argue that primary emission w
ould be characterized by a dramatically Doppler-broadened (similar to 10-15
Angstrom) and redshifted line profile resulting from the cascade process a
nd the angle between the line of sight and the magnetic held lines in the a
tmosphere. In contrast, ambient emission would be distinguished by narrow e
mission lines. We have modeled the theoretical sulfur and oxygen line shape
s for ion precipitation and conclude that electron precipitation is respons
ible for most of the H-2 emissions. O ions contributed <13% of the precipit
ating energy flux, and S ions contributed < 50%. This dominance suggests th
at field-aligned magnetospheric currents are more important than energetiza
tion of energetic ions and subsequent scattering by plasma waves as a mecha
nism for generating the Jovian aurora. We set an upper limit over our spect
ra of 35-43 R to the emission from ambient oxygen and sulfur ions and their
neutrals, except that for the S II 1256 triplet, the upper limit for the n
ominally brightest line, at 1260 Angstrom, is 74 R. Hence, we find no evide
nce for the accumulation of sulfur in the auroral ionosphere. A single narr
ow emission line from an unidentified ambient specie near 1254 Angstrom may
be detected at the 4 sigma level, introducing the possibility of complex a
uroral aeronomy. Differences were observed in the auroral spectral hydrocar
bon absorption at different locations, which cannot be interpreted without
ambiguity between auroral and atmospheric structural causes. We have found
that the brighter emission in an auroral sector consistently shows more spe
ctral hydrocarbon absorption than the dimmer emission. We suggest two alter
native physical explanations for this phenomenon.