Common and specific dimensions of self-reported anxiety and depression: the BDI-II versus the BDI-IA

Citation
Ra. Steer et al., Common and specific dimensions of self-reported anxiety and depression: the BDI-II versus the BDI-IA, BEHAV RES T, 37(2), 1999, pp. 183-190
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY
ISSN journal
00057967 → ACNP
Volume
37
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Pages
183 - 190
Database
ISI
SICI code
0005-7967(199902)37:2<183:CASDOS>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) [Beck, A.T., Steer, R. A. & Brown , G. K. (1996). Manual for Beck Depression Inventory-ii. San Antonio, TX: P sychological Corporation.] and Anxiety Inventory (BAI) [Beck, A. T. & Steer , R. A. (1993a). Manual for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Ps ychological Corporation.] were administered to 840 outpatients who were dia gnosed with various types of psychiatric disorders to determine whether the general symptom compositions and relative amounts of variance of the commo n and specific dimensions of self-reported anxiety and depression for these instruments would be comparable to those that had been found by Steer et a l. [Steer, R. A., Clark, D. A., Beck, A. T. & Ranieri, W. F. (1995). Common and specific dimensions of self-reported anxiety and depression: A replica tion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 542-545.] with the BAI and amend ed Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA) [Beck, A. T. & Steer, R. A. (1993b). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Co rporation.]. A Schmid-Leiman transformation was used with the iterated-prin cipal-factor pattern matrix of the BAI and the BDI-II loadings and indicate d that the overall symptom compositions and relative amounts of variance th at were explained by the one common and two specific anxiety and depression dimensions were comparable to those previously found with the BDI-IA. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.