Expression of Fos in the circadian system following nonphotic stimulation

Citation
Jd. Mikkelsen et al., Expression of Fos in the circadian system following nonphotic stimulation, BRAIN RES B, 47(4), 1998, pp. 367-376
Citations number
51
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN
ISSN journal
03619230 → ACNP
Volume
47
Issue
4
Year of publication
1998
Pages
367 - 376
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-9230(19981101)47:4<367:EOFITC>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Syrian hamsters, Mesocricetus auratus, were confined to novel running wheel s for a 3-h period, starting at approximately circadian time (CT) 4.5 (i.e. , approaching the middle of their subjective day). It can be reliably predi cted from the amount of running in this situation whether or not there will be a subsequent phase-shift. Expression of the immediate early genes c-fos and fosB was examined by immunocytochemistry in the suprachiasmatic nucleu s (SCN), the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) of the thalamus, and the medial pretectal area of hamsters that ran vigorously in the novel wheel and would have phase-shifted. c-Fos was increased, compared to levels in a control g roup left in their home cages, in the IGL, and the pretectum (PT), but decr eased in the SCN. No significant changes in FosB were detected in any regio n examined. An additional experiment argued against the possibility that th e changes in c-Fos could be attributed to a rapid advance of the pacemaker to a different phase in the circadian cycle. Counts of c-fos-positive cells in the IGL were similar in animals given pulses of running starting at CT 4.5 and starting at CT 12.5-16 (i.e., in the subjective night when they wou ld have been active anyway). Altogether the results support the view that a ctivation of the IGL is important in nonphotic clock resetting, and raise t he possibility that the PT may also be involved in nonphotic resetting. How ever, the results also indicate that novelty-induced running does not alter c-Fos induction in a phase-specific manner in the IGL. The inhibition of c -Fos in the SCN by nonphotic phase-shifting events contrasts with the well- known inducing effects of light pulses. These different effects might under lie some of the interactions between nonphotic and photic zeitgebers when b oth act together on the circadian system. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Inc.