Background. People vary greatly with respect to the way they explain negati
ve events (personal failures), and this variation in attributional style se
ems to be related to various personality traits and also academic performan
ce. For example, the theory of learned helplessness regards a pessimistic a
ttributional style as an important determinant in the development of depres
sion.
Aim. The primary purpose of the present study was to compare attributions f
ar positive and negative events with respect to correlations with seven per
sonality dispositions. The comparisons concern the three attributional dime
nsions internality, stability and globality, as well as their combination.
The hypothesis was that attributions for positive events are differently co
rrelated with the seven personality dispositions than are attributions for
negative events.
Sample. 166 advanced teacher students (132 females and 34 males).
Method. On the basis of an inventory the students were given scores on the
attributional variables (related to imagined positive and negative academic
events), global and academic self-esteem, motive to seek success, motive t
o avoid failure, self-efficacy, defensiveness, and depression.
Results. The hypothesis was confirmed. Attributions for positive events cor
related differently with the seven personality dispositions than attributio
ns for negative events. Also, factor analysis of the attributional dimensio
ns indicated that attributions for positive events measured quite different
components than attributions for positive events.
Conclusion. The general conclusion is that both event kinds should be consi
dered when using attributional style for predicting or explaining personali
ty and behavioural variables.