U. Rapp-bernhardt et al., Comparison of three-dimensional virtual endoscopy with bronchoscopy in patients with oesophageal carcinoma infiltrating the tracheobronchial tree, BR J RADIOL, 71(852), 1998, pp. 1271-1278
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Virtual endoscopy (VE) is a technique for performing simulated bronchoscopy
using helical CT data of the tracheobronchial tree. In order to evaluate a
virtual three-dimensional (3D) endoluminal procedure for the tracheobronch
ial tree, comparison was made between bronchoscopy, axial CT images and min
imal intensity projections (MIP). 21 patients were referred for helical CT
because of oesophageal carcinoma shown by bronchoscopy to infiltrate into t
he trachea or bronchi. Axial CT images obtained on a helical scanner were t
ransferred to a Sparc20 workstation. VE was compared with the axial CT imag
es and the MIP concerning additional information on the location and degree
of stenosis gained after 3D reconstruction of the inner surface of the tra
cheobronchial tree. The accuracy of this VE system was compared with bronch
oscopy. Follow-up was performed in two patients to evaluate the tracheobron
chial system after stent implantation. All stenoses were identified by VE w
ith no statistically significant difference in detection of location or gra
ding of the stenosis to real time bronchoscopy. Passage of subtotal stenosi
s was only possible with VE. VE is suitable for following up stent implanta
tion. Submucosal lesions of the tracheobronchial tree could not be detected
by VE. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the loc
ation of the stenoses between VE, axial CT slices, MIP and bronchoscopy. Th
e VE showed only a statistically significant difference with regard to the
degree of stenosis which was underrated on axial CT slices and MIPs. Pitfal
ls including mucus plugs and wall defects due to the wrong threshold value
were a limitation of VE. VE is presently too time-consuming to use in every
patient with an infiltrating tumour into the tracheobronchial tree. In con
clusion, while VE cannot replace endoscopy of the tracheobronchial tree or
the oesophagus, it is an accurate and non-invasive method for identifying e
ndoluminal tumours, grading stenoses and visualizing the tracheobronchial t
ree beyond stenoses in a small number of patients who are not amenable to e
ndoscopy.