Ultrasound velocity of trabecular cubes reflects mainly bone density and elasticity

Citation
D. Hans et al., Ultrasound velocity of trabecular cubes reflects mainly bone density and elasticity, CALCIF TIS, 64(1), 1999, pp. 18-23
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
0171967X → ACNP
Volume
64
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
18 - 23
Database
ISI
SICI code
0171-967X(199901)64:1<18:UVOTCR>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Studies have indicated that quantitative ultrasound (QUS) variables may be influenced by the mechanical properties of bone which in turn are determine d by bone's material and structural properties. However. from these studies it is unclear what rule density, elasticity, and structure play in determi ning velocity. Eighteen defatted, 12-mm cubic trabecular bone specimens wer e cut from cadaveric specimens. Amplitude-dependent speed of sound (SOS) us ing a single point QUS system was assessed in three orthogonal axes. Magnet ic resonance images were obtained, from which measures of apparent trabeucl ar structure were derived. The specimens were nondestructively tested in co mpression along three orthogonal axes defined by the sides of the cubes. Th e elastic modulus tin the three directions) and the strength tin one direct ion) were determined. Trabecular BMD was measured by quantitative computed tomography. SOS varied significantly with direction of measurement, with th e highest value in the axial direction (axial:1715 m/s, sagittal: 1662 m/se cond, and coronal: 1676 m/s). SOS of each of the three axes was generally a ssociated with the various mechanical (r = 0.300.87), density (r = 0.81-0.9 3), and bone structural variables (0.3-0.8). However, after adjusting the S OS correlations by density, only the correlation with elasticity remained s ignificant in the coronal direction. BMD alone explained 88-93% of variance in SOS whereas in the multivariate model, BMD plus elasticity and/or aniso tropic variables explained 96-98% of the variance in SOS. Variability of SO S is explained mostly by density and to a small extent by elasticity or ani sotropy. Since only 2-6% of the variance of the QUS measurement is not expl ained by density and elasticity, one could conclude that the remaining vari ance reflects other properties of bone or perhaps simply measurement error. Evidence that these other properties may be structure related is only foun d in the anisotropy of QUS parameter.