A comparative study of phase Doppler and laser diffraction techniques to investigate drop sizes in annular two-phase flow

Citation
Sh. Zaidi et al., A comparative study of phase Doppler and laser diffraction techniques to investigate drop sizes in annular two-phase flow, CHEM ENGN J, 71(2), 1998, pp. 135-143
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Chemical Engineering
Journal title
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
ISSN journal
13858947 → ACNP
Volume
71
Issue
2
Year of publication
1998
Pages
135 - 143
Database
ISI
SICI code
1385-8947(199812)71:2<135:ACSOPD>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Drop size information is a common requirement in many parts of industry. Ph ase Doppler anemometry and laser diffraction techniques are usually employe d for this purpose. Both measuring techniques give the drop size whereas th e phase Doppler anemometry also provides additional information on the drop velocities. In the present work an inclinable two-phase flow facility has been constructed and the impact of inclination on the drop sizes has been i nvestigated. This paper describes the drop size results obtained from two l aser techniques and identifies the difference in drop sizes obtained from t wo laser systems when measurements were made under similar flow conditions. Possible reasons for this discrepancy have been discussed and a technique has been suggested to modify the new data obtained from the phase Doppler a nemometry. The modified data have then been compared with those obtained fr om the laser diffraction technique. Results from both laser systems reveal similar trends in the measurements made under identical flow conditions. It has been found that the drop sizes are affected by the flow orientation an d the effect is more pronounced at angles greater than 50 degrees from the vertical. The effect of liquid mass flux has also been recorded. General pr oblems and common sources of error while employing these two laser techniqu es have also been identified and necessary steps required to obtain laser r esults have been discussed in detail. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science S.A. All ri ghts reserved.