El. Gilman, Nationwide permit program: Unknown adverse impacts on the commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands' wetlands, COAST MANAG, 26(4), 1998, pp. 253-277
Of the 39 Nationwide Permits (NWPs) that came into effect on 11 February 19
97 11 authorize activities that could impact Commonwealth of the Northern M
ariana Islands (CNMI) wetlands. Because managers of CNMI wetlands lack an a
ccurate scientific basis for determining the significance of proposed wetla
nd impacts, the CNMI denied and conditioned Clean Water Act Section 401 Wat
er Quality Certifications and Coastal Zone Management Act Section 307 consi
stency concurrences for these 11 NWPs to reduce the likelihood of the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) authorizing more than minimal adverse wetla
nd impacts under the NWP program. The CNMI decided that the benefits of req
uiring a more stringent review process outweigh the costs of increasing the
regulatory burden on developers. A review of authorized CNMI wetland impac
ts indicates that the loss of wetland quantity under the NWP program on Sai
pan is minimal. However managers do not know if the site specific and cumul
ative loss of wetland quality-wetland functional performance and provision
of valued services-is significant. The Corps authorized 7 projects under NW
Ps that impacted CNMI wetlands. These 7 projects impacted 10 of Saipan's 37
freshwater wetlands and filled approximately 3.6 hectares or 1.5% of the i
sland's total freshwater wetland area. Seven of these 10 affected sires wer
e isolated wetlands. Nationwide, the Corps does not know if the cumulative
loss of wetland area, functions, and values authorized under the NWP progra
m has been minimal because the Corps has incomplete data on wetland impacts
. Also, because most regions of the United States lack standardized assessm
ent methods that estimate changes in functional performance and provision o
f valued services by local wetland classes, because many regions do not hav
e the ability to define thresholds for cumulative wetland impacts, and beca
use even small, isolated and temporary wetlands may possess valued function
s, the Corps does not know if wetland impacts authorized under the NWP prog
ram have been minimal. The Corps lacks an accurate basis for defining what
constitutes a more than minimal adverse wetland impact to implement the NWP
Program. Regulators assume that conserving wetland area prevents a net los
s of functional performance and the provision of valued wetland services, b
ut they have no means to confirm the accuracy of this assumption. Condition
ing and denying the use of NWPs that could be used to authorize wetland imp
acts creates a more stringent review process bur still results in the conti
nued authorization of unknown wetland impacts under provisional NWPs and In
dividual Permits. A proposed solution is to develop regional wetland assess
ment methods for each wetland class to allow for the management of the proj
ect-specific and cumulative effects of wetland degradation on wetlands func
tional performance and provision of valued services. This provides wetland
managers with the requisite information to condition relevant NWPs to ensur
e that no more than minimal adverse wetland impacts are authorized in their
region.