Y. Ikeda et al., Oral and epicutaneous desensitization in urushiol contact dermatitis in guinea pigs sensitized by 2 methods of different sensitizing potency, CONTACT DER, 39(6), 1998, pp. 286-292
This investigation was conducted to study the relationship between the diff
erent intensities of sensitization to urushiol induced by the maximization
test method (MT) or by the ear-flank method (EF) in guinea pigs, and hypose
nsitization induced by repeated oral and/or epicutaneous administration of
the allergen, and to compare the immune tolerance achieved between these ro
utes of dosing. During the observation period of 10 weeks, both oral and ep
icutaneous administration produced hyposensitization to urushiol after weak
sensitization by EF: however, only combined administrations via the oral a
nd epicutaneous routes achieved hyposensitization after potent sensitizatio
n, while inadequate tolerance was induced by oral dosing and none by epicut
aneous dosing. Thus, it is indicated that difficulty in establishing immune
tolerance may increase with increasing intensity of primary sensitization,
and that hyposensitizing potency tends to increase in the order epicutaneo
us, oral and combined (e.p. + p.o.) administrations of urushiol.