Comparison between a lyse-and-then-wash method and a lyse-non-wash technique for the enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells

Citation
P. Menendez et al., Comparison between a lyse-and-then-wash method and a lyse-non-wash technique for the enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells, CYTOMETRY, 34(6), 1998, pp. 264-271
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
CYTOMETRY
ISSN journal
01964763 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
6
Year of publication
1998
Pages
264 - 271
Database
ISI
SICI code
0196-4763(199812)34:6<264:CBALMA>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hemopoietic precursor cells (HPC) present in samples used for transplantation of HPC has proven to be the mos t powerful single parameter for prediction of engraftment, At present, seve ral different methodological approaches are used for the flow cytometric en umeration of CD34+ HPC, In the present study we have compared two of these methods as regards enumeration of CD34+ HPC and their CD34+/CD19- and CD34/CD19+ subsets: a lyse-non-wash procedure based on the use of a recently co mmercialized red cell lysing solution (Quicklysis, Cytognos, Salamanca, Spa in) and a lyse-and-then-wash method in which the Becton Dickinson (San lose , CA) FAGS Lysing Solution was used. For that purpose a total of 52 samples corresponding to 20 G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood (PB) samples and 21 P B-derived leucapheresis products from patients undergoing autologous PB ste m cell harvest, together with 11 bone marrow (BM) samples from healthy volu nteers were analyzed. Our results show that for each of the three types of samples analyzed the use of the lyse-and-then-wash method is associated wit h significantly lower numbers of both total CD34+ HPC (P less than or equal to 0.003) and its major CD34+/CD19- subset (P less than or equal to 0.01) while no significant changes are detected in the number of CD34+/CD19+ HPC in BM samples (P > 0.05), The use of an internal standard (reference beads) added just prior to data acquisition, showed that the differences between both methods are due to a selective loss of CD34+ HPC and its major CD34+/C D19- subset in BM (P = 0.002 and P = 0.003), PB (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001) and PB-derived leucapheresis products (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0001). Finally , addition of a centrifugation and washing step to a group of 11 leucaphere sis samples lysed with Quicklysis showed that they did not significantly af fect the overall number of total CD34+, CD34+/CD19- and CD34+/CD19+ HPC obt ained. In line with these findings elimination of centrifugation and washin g steps when FAGS Lysing Solution was used to lyse mature red cells almost corrected for the selective loss of CD34+ HPC, In spite of these difference s a significant degree of correlation (r > 0.83 in all cases) was found bet ween both methods regarding the total number of CD34+, CD34+/CD19- and CD34 +/CD19+ HPC present in the BM, PB and PB-derived leucapheresis samples anal yzed in this study. (C) 1998 Wiley-Liss, Inc.