Yc. Pai et al., Static versus dynamic predictions of protective stepping following waist-pull perturbations in young and older adults, J BIOMECHAN, 31(12), 1998, pp. 1111-1118
The purposes of this study were: (1) to determine the frequency of protecti
ve stepping for balance recovery in subjects of different ages and fall-sta
tus, and (2) to compare predicted stepping based on a dynamic model (Pai an
d Patron, 1997. Journal of Biomechanics 30, 347-354) involving displacement
and velocity combinations of the center of mass (COM) versus a static mode
l based on displacement alone against experimentally induced stepping. Resp
onses to three different magnitudes of forward waist pulls were recorded fo
r 13 young, 18 older-non-fallers and 18 older-fallers, The COM phase plane
trajectories derived from motion analysis were compared with the model-pred
icted threshold values for stepping. We found that the older fallers had th
e highest percentage of stepping trials (52%), followed by older-non-faller
s (17.3%), and young (2.7%) at the lowest perturbation level. Younger subje
cts stepped less often than the elderly at the middle level. Everyone consi
stently stepped at the highest level of perturbation. Overall, the dynamic
model showed better predictive capacity (65%) than the static model (5%) fo
r estimating the initiation of stepping. Furthermore, the threshold for ste
p initiation derived from the dynamic model could consistently predict when
a step must occur. However, it was limited, especially among older fallers
at the low perturbation level, in that it considered some steps 'unnecessa
ry' that were presumably triggered by fear of falling or other factors. (C)
1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.