The small polyp at flexible sigmoidoscopy: An historical perspective on why practices still vary

Authors
Citation
Dk. Rex, The small polyp at flexible sigmoidoscopy: An historical perspective on why practices still vary, J CLIN GAST, 28(1), 1999, pp. 19-22
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenerology and Hepatology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY
ISSN journal
01920790 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
19 - 22
Database
ISI
SICI code
0192-0790(199901)28:1<19:TSPAFS>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Current practices vary regarding the approach to small polyps discovered du ring screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. The most common practice is to perfo rm colonoscopy whenever any adenoma is detected, a strategy that generally uses biopsy of polyps less than or equal to 5 mm in size. However, data sug gest that tubular adenomas < I cm in size in the distal colon have less pre dictive value than other distal adenomas for advanced adenomas in the proxi mal colon. Thus, some centers reserve colonoscopy for distal adenomas with tubulovillous or villous histology, >1 cm in size, or with high-grade dyspl asia. At the other end of the spectrum, another school of thought advocates screening colonoscopy, recognizing that most patients with advanced proxim al adenomas do not have polyps in their distal colon. Advocates of this app roach use any excuse to perform colonoscopy, whether it be a positive fecal occult blood test, minor symptoms, or small polyp at flexible sigmoidoscop y, even if hyperplastic. This review describes the history of the controver sy regarding management of findings at flexible sigmoidoscopy, the data per tinent to the controversy, and the basis for the three approaches described above, all of which are currently within the standard of medical care.