Objective: The objective of this study was to ascertain which factors deter
mine the rigidity of a hybrid external fixation frame in a tibial periartic
ular fracture model.
Design: Laboratory investigation using a polyvinylchloride pipe periarticul
ar tibia fracture model.
Setting: Simulated periarticular tibia fractures were created in a tibia mo
del. Instrumented specimens were tested in a biomaterials resting system.
Intervention: Groups of simulated periarticular tibia fractures were stabil
ized with one of nine different external fixation constructs with component
s from one manufacturer.
Main Outcome Measurements: Elastic stiffness was measured for each specimen
in compression, torsion, flexion bending, extension bending, and varus and
valgus bending.
Results: The four-ring Ilizarov fixator was the stiffest in all modes of te
sting. There was a trend toward increasing stiffness with an increasing num
ber of rings. Fixators constructed with multiple levels of fixation in the
periarticular fragment were stiffer in all modes of testing, The additional
spacing between wires gained by the use of a single thick carbon ring or t
he use of a drop wire three centimeters from a single ring did not increase
stiffness in this model. Frame modifications intended to augment the bar-t
o-ring connection did not increase stiffness. The use of rings mounted with
half-pins instead of a unilateral bar mounted with half-pins for diaphysea
l fixation increased the stiffness of the frame only in torsional testing.
Conclusions: Although the ideal stiffness of an external fixator is unknown
, our results show that the addition of more than one level of fixation in
the periarticular fragment increases the stiffness of hybrid external fixat
ors in this periarticular tibia fracture model. Augmentation of the ring-to
-bar connection did not significantly affect the stiffness of the Frame.