RESULTS OF ARTHROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN BANKART SUTURE REPAIR

Citation
Df. Geiger et al., RESULTS OF ARTHROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN BANKART SUTURE REPAIR, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (337), 1997, pp. 111-117
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,Orthopedics
ISSN journal
0009921X
Issue
337
Year of publication
1997
Pages
111 - 117
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-921X(1997):337<111:ROAVOB>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare patients with anterior should er instability who were treated with an open Bankart procedure with th ose treated with an arthroscopic procedure, During a 3-year period, 43 patients (44 shoulders) were surgically treated, Thirty-four patients were available for followup, Eighteen shoulders had open Bankart proc edure, and 16 shoulders were treated arthroscopically, Capsular laxity can be better assessed with the open procedure, A Bankart lesion was found in all the patients in both series, Average followup for Group 1 was 34 months, and for Group 2, it was 23 months, Group 1 had 83% goo d to excellent results with no recurrent dislocation or reoperation, G roup 2 had 50% good to excellent results, and 50% fair to poor results with 3 recurrent dislocations and 4 recurrent subluxations that requi red second operation. The average loss of external rotation in Group 1 was not significantly greater than that in Group 2, Sixteen patients in Group 1 and 8 patients in Group 2 were able to return to their prim ary work or sport, Results of arthroscopic Bankart repair do not equal those of the open Bankart procedure for the rate of recurrence and po stoperative range of motion, The followup reported is short, and more dislocations can be anticipated with longer followup.